Skip repetitive navigation links.
United States Department of AgricultureFarm Services AgencyFarm Service Agency
Go to FSA Home Go to FSA Home Go to About FSA Go to State Offices Go to Newsroom Go to Online Services Go to Forms Go to Help Go to Contact Us Go to Spanish Languages
Search FSA
Go To Search Tips
Browse by Audience
Agribusiness
Cooperatives
Congress
FSA Employees
Landowners
Conservationists
Lenders and Banks
Media
Parents and Caregivers
Producers
Researchers
Academic Community
Browse by Subject
Go to Aerial Photography
Go to Commodity Operations
Go to Conservation Programs
Go to Direct and Counter-Cyclical Program/ACRE
Go to Disaster Assistance Programs
Go to Economic and Policy Analysis
Go to Energy Programs
Go to Environmental and Cultural Resource Compliance
Go to Farm Loan Programs
Go to Financial Management Information
Go to Laws and Regulations
Go to Modernize and Innovate the Delivery of Agricultural Systems
Go to Outreach and Education
Go to Payment Eligibility
Go to Price Support
Go to Tobacco
About FSA
Performance Evaluations

 
As part of the Budget and Performance Management System (BPMS) process, FSA collects program and performance data to report to external audiences, such as the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). BPMS also supports internal evaluation by contributing to the Department's management scorecard and assessments.

 
Independent Evaluations

 
Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)

 
The OMB Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART), is a standard questionnaire being applied as an assessment of the efficiency and effectiveness of government programs based on performance and management criteria. The use of this tool encourages continuous program improvement, identifies those programs which achieve their intended results, and helps to determine areas in which performance can be improved.

 
The PART is designed to evaluate program performance by reviewing four key areas:

 
  • 1. Program Purpose and Design
  • 2. Strategic Planning
  • 3. Program Management
  • 4. Program Results and Accountability

 
OMB encourages transparency in government and publishes the results of the PART evaluations at ExpectMore.gov. Programs are rated as either "Effective," "Moderately Effective," "Adequate," "Ineffective," or "Results Not Demonstrated. This process assists OMB and federal agencies in making informed decisions while enlightening Congress and other stakeholders on program performance.

 
Finding PART Evaluations

 
The PART evaluation results are found at OMB's ExpectMore.gov website.

 
Select "Department of Agriculture" from the AGENCY drop down selection Press GO.

 
Scroll down below the pie graphs to find the PART results for the following FSA programs: Bioenergy
Bioenergy
Conservation Reserve Program (CRP)
Counter-Cyclical Payment
Direct Crop Payment (DCP)
Direct Farm Loans / Agriculture Credit Insurance Fund (ACIF) Direct Loans
Emergency Conservation Program(ECP)
Guaranteed Farm Loans /Agriculture Credit Insurance Fund Guaranteed Loans
Marketing Assistance Loans (MAL)
Milk (Dairy) Price Support Purchase Program (MPSP / DPSP)
Milk Income Loss Contract Program(MILC)
Non-Insured Crop Disaster Assistance Program (NAP)

 

 
U.S. Department of Agriculture Internal Scorecard for Agencies

 
OMB Scorecard for Departments

 
The Executive Branch Management Scorecard tracks how well the Federal government is executing the President's Management Agenda (PMA). OMB tracks the performance of each Department and that of major Federal agencies in executing the five Government-wide PMA management initiatives.

 
The Stoplight Scoring System

 
The scorecard employs a simple grading system common today in well-run businesses:

 
  • Green for success,
  • Yellow for mixed results, and
  • Red for unsatisfactory.

 
For further explanation and to view the most recent PMA Scorecards, please follow the link below:

 

 
In 2005, in an effort to improve accountability and program management, USDA adopted its own internal management PMA scorecard based on the rating system used by OMB. Agencies self-assess using established criteria linked to the PMA initiative. The Department then reviews the assessment and provides a quarterly score. USDA uses a simple grading system of red, yellow, and green to mark individual agencies' results. Green is for success; Yellow is for mixed results; and Red denotes unsatisfactory progress.

 

 
The USDA Office of the Inspector General conducts periodic reports on Agency programs and initiatives. The results are reported to Congress on a semi-annual basis.

 

 

 
Related Topics
Bullet Performance Reports
Bullet Performance Evaluations
STAY CONNECTED:
twitter FaceBook widget Ask FSA Fence Post RSS YouTube

Media Help
 To view PDF files you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader installed on your computer.

To view Flash files you must have Adobe Flash Player installed on your computer.


Last Modified: 08/11/10 2:38:51 PM


FSA Home | USDA.gov | Common Questions | Site Map | Policies and Links
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House